Improving legibility of natural deduction proofs is not trivial

نویسنده

  • Karol Pak
چکیده

In formal proof checking environments such as Mizar it is not merely the validity of mathematical formulas that is evaluated in the process of adoption to the body of accepted formalizations, but also the readability of the proofs that witness validity. As in case of computer programs, such proof scripts may sometimes be more and sometimes be less readable. To better understand the notion of readability of formal proofs, and to assess and improve their readability, we propose in this paper a method of improving proof readability based on Behaghel’s First Law of sentence structure. Our method maximizes the number of local references to the directly preceding statement in a proof linearisation. It is shown that our optimization method is NP-complete.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Redirecting Proofs by Contradiction

This paper presents an algorithm that redirects proofs by contradiction. The input is a refutation graph, as produced by an automatic theorem prover (e.g., E, SPASS, Vampire, Z3); the output is a direct proof expressed in natural deduction extendedwith case analyses and nested subproofs. The algorithm is implemented in Isabelle’s Sledgehammer, where it enhances the legibility of machine-generat...

متن کامل

Takahito Aoto Hiroakira Ono NON-UNIQUENESS OF NORMAL PROOFS FOR MINIMAL FORMULAS IN IMPLICATION-CONJUNCTION FRAGMENT OF BCK

A minimal formula of a given logic L is a formula which is provable in L and is not a non-trivial substitution instance of other provable formulas in L. In [5], Y. Komori asked whether normal proofs of minimal formulas are unique in the implicational fragments of natural deduction systems for the intuitionistic logic and the logic BCK. It was already shown that the answer is positive for BCK, w...

متن کامل

Regaining cut admissibility in deduction modulo using abstract completion

Deduction modulo is a way to combine computation and deduction in proofs, by applying the inference rules of a deductive system (e.g. natural deduction or sequent calculus) modulo some congruence that we assume here to be presented by a set of rewrite rules. Using deduction modulo is equivalent to proving in a theory corresponding to the rewrite rules, and leads to proofs that are often shorter...

متن کامل

Canonical Sequent Proofs via Multi-Focusing

The sequent calculus admits many proofs of the same conclusion that differ only by trivial permutations of inference rules. In order to eliminate this “bureaucracy” from sequent proofs, deductive formalisms such as proof nets or natural deduction are usually used instead of the sequent calculus, for they identify proofs more abstractly and geometrically. In this paper we recover permutative can...

متن کامل

A Translation of Model Elimination Proofs into a Structured Natural Deduction

Model Elimination is a frequently used calculus in automated theorem proving (ATP). Powerful implementations are available. Unfortunately, the automatically generated proofs are not very readable for humans. The Block Calculus is a variant of Natural Deduction that makes it possible to generate struc-tured proofs. It is convenient for natural language proof presentation, and it is also usable f...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Logical Methods in Computer Science

دوره 10  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2014